The Family Matters theme song opens with the line “it’s a rare condition, in this day and age, to read any good news, on the newspaper page.” Of course, it’s probably been rare to see good news in newspapers in any age, but that doesn’t make the song any less apropos for our time. More specifically however, I’m always surprised to see “news” that exists seemingly for the sole purpose of making people afraid of some commonplace thing. For example, I remember when my mom stopped letting us eat raw cookie dough because she read that the raw eggs could give us salmonella. A lot of the news I read online seems to work in similar ways. It makes us afraid of common foods, different people, normal behavior, and global pandemics (really, just look at the “Crime” or “Health sections on any news site for numerous examples). None of this news is fabricated; instead it finds a real problem and suggests that it might be a real big problem. (Jon recently discussed hitchhiking and how people become afraid of people, among other interesting points.)
While all these threats may be very important, the result of all this fear mongering “news” simply seems to be less trust. People suddenly have to avoid activities they enjoy and, even more disheartening, they avoid new people because those people may be drug addicts, "gang bangers," or mass murderers. As a result communities shrink and interactions become laced with suspicion. The pattern of fear is perpetuated as parents remove their children from social situations because they can’t trust other adults not to molest their kids.
I see this as a real problem, so maybe I’m guilty of doing the very thing I’m condemning by describing a situation and then raising alarm over it. The difference, I hope, is that there is a simple and rather pleasant solution to this problem: choose to trust. I think it’s possible to choose to believe that every person out there is actually a great person. It’s possible to assume that public places won’t make us sick. It’s possible to assume that every child who goes over to a friend’s house or gets on the internet won’t fall victim to a sexual predator.
In some circles, choosing to trust is already common. One example that comes to mind is couch surfing, which involves allowing total strangers into your home while they’re traveling. Depending on how it’s done the participants may know more or less about each other beforehand, but ultimately it requires that people simply believe that they won’t hurt each other. And in the end, they usually don’t. I experienced a similar situation recently when a band from Las Vegas offered to let my band stay at their house on an up coming trip. They didn’t know us and we very easily could be the kind of people who would rob them blind (or worse). Still, they chose to believe that that wouldn’t happen and the result was that we’ve all made new friends.
In the end, these examples can’t solve the world’s problems, but they do lead me to believe that fear and suspicion are choices that can be avoided. I also know that if everyone chose to trust everyone else all the time, there would be causalities. Someone would end up trusting the murderer or the sexual predator. Still, fear doesn't seem to provide much protection now, and, more importantly, the trade off is worth it. If we try to trust more we'll be happier and have more fulfilling experiences.
Reading your post made me recall this:
ReplyDeletePoem on the Underground
Proud readers
Hide behind tall newspapers.
The young are all arms and legs
Knackered by youth.
Tourists sit bolt upright
Trusting in nothing.
Only the drunk and the crazy
Aspire to converse.
Only the poet
Peruses his poem among the adverts.
Only the elderly person
Observes the request that the seat be offered
to an elderly person.
- British poet, D. J. Enright
Dang, that's a good one.
I liked this post, and I think at the heart of the matter, you're right. But I also think that while it's important not to be paranoid and ultra suspicious, certain levels of caution are helpful (and if you're a parent, helping choose age appropriate levels of caution with your children is also necessary). But I do think there is a lot of abnormal fear about things that happen far and few between. And the media is really good about making an incident into "a story."
ReplyDeleteAlso, technically you can get salmonella from raw eggs... you'd just have to drink them by the gallon. LOL.
I agree, too, and I would rather err on the side of safety as well than risk anything; there's a difference between stupidly trusting and intelligently trusting.
ReplyDeleteThat said, I learned to trust people when I went to England. I was traveling all by myself (my dad was horrified: a woman, alone, traveling! oh no!), and if I hadn't trusted complete strangers, I would have been in trouble a few times. I learned that most people are good at heart, want to help others, and aren't ax murderers. Sounds strange, but this really surprised me for some reason. I guess I was raised in a paranoid culture.
(From Kellyanne, by the way)
I think I agree alot with Makayla on this one...
ReplyDeleteI've seen people be 100% trusting and get slammed, abused, hurt over and over and somehow find it in them to continue to trust 100%. But I agree with you that there is a sort of paranoia and we could ALL use to be a bit more trusting.
In Japan there are so many people that amazingly everyone is aware of anyone else. Seriously you can cross the street right before a car reaches you and they will stop every time because you always have the right of way. I tried to do that over and over here and John always leaped in the street and pulled me back while telling me they wouldn't stop for me. Saying this I think context is VERY important. If you're in a shady part of town with shady people have you guard up a little more than usual. If you have no reason not to trust someone, trust them
Good post.
good use of the word "gang bangers."
ReplyDelete